Gadagkar, Raghavendra (1985) Kin recognition in social insects and other animals-A review of recent findings and a consideration of their relevance for the theory of kin selection. In: Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences (Animal Science), 94 (6). pp. 587-621.
Kin selection is a widely invoked mechanism to explain the origin and evolution of social behaviour in animals. Proponents of the theory of kin selection place great emphasis on thecorrelation betweenasymmetries in genetic relatedness created by haplodiploidy and the multiple origins of eusociality in the order Hymenoptera. The fact that a female is more closely related genetically to her full sister than to her daughtersmakes it more profitable for a Hymenopteran female, in terms of inclusive fitness, to raise full sisters rather than daughters or full siblings with a female biased sex ratio ratherthan offspring. This is sometimes referred to as the haplodiploidyhypothesis. In reality however,genetic relatedness between workers in social insect colonies and the reproductive brood they rear is far below 0-75,the value expected for full sisters, often below 005 the value expected between mother and daughter and, not uncommonly, approaching zero.Such values are on account of queen turnover, multiple mating by queens or polygyny. This situation raises doubts regarding the haplodiploidy hypothesis unless workers can discriminate between full and half sisters andpreferentially direct their altruism towards their full sisters only. This would still mean an effective coefficient of genetic relatedness of 0-75 between altruist and recipient. For this to be possible however,workers should be able to recognise their full sisters inspite of growing up with and being habituated to an assortment of full sisters, half sisters and perhaps other even less related individuals. Even outside the Hymenoptera,s ociala nimals may find themselvesg rowing up together in the companyo f individuals of varying degreeso f relatednessA. n ability to tell apart the more and less related individuals under suchcircumstances should favour kin selection. Much effort is now going into assessingth e abilities of animals to discriminate betweenk in and non kin. In every case studied carefully so far, animals appear to be capable of recognising their kin. Ants, wasps, sweat bees, honey bees,frogs,toads, mice, rats, voles, squirrels, monkeys and even humans appear to be able to recognise their kin in one circumstance or another. An ability to recognize true genetic relatedness requires genetically specified recognition labels and these must therefore be present. Recent findings of the role of the his to compatibility system provides some clues to the possible nature of recognition labels. An ability to recognise full sisters for example,inspite of being habituated to full and half sisters requires not merely genetically specified labels but also recognition templates which are based on the characteristics of the individual animals making the recognition and not templates based on all animals one grows up with. Some animals such as honey bees, tadpoles and ground squirrels appear to have such templates but others such as sweat bees and some mice appear not to. It is entirely possible that our inability to devise natural enough assays for recognition prevents us from understanding the full potential of the kin recognition abilities of many animals sspecies in any case, genetically specified labels and self based templates should greatly facilitate the evolution of social behaviour by kin selection.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Genetic relatedness;Kin recognition;Kin selection; Hymenoptera;Haplodiploidy;Evolution of social behaviour|
|Department/Centre:||Division of Biological Sciences > Centre for Ecological Sciences|
|Date Deposited:||28 Nov 2006|
|Last Modified:||19 Sep 2010 04:32|
Actions (login required)